Where should you start?

If you have five ideas on a whiteboard and none of them has moved in six months, that is rarely a motivation problem. What is usually missing is an outside, unsentimental view of where the biggest and fastest gain actually sits — in your systems, with your data, at your company size. A vendor has every incentive to say that everything is a fit. A colleague has every incentive to protect their own process.

The free AI assessment answers exactly that question. You fill in the questionnaire below in about eight minutes, and within 48 hours we send back a short, readable report on your company's AI maturity and on the three processes worth automating first. Not a 40-page strategy PDF — concrete recommendations you could start acting on the next morning.

Once you submit, someone on our team reads your answers by hand — no generator spits out the document. We look at your industry, your headcount, the systems you listed and what eats the most time today. The assessment is built from that, and it arrives by e-mail as a short document, not as a slide deck with your logo pasted on the cover.

Managing directors, operations and finance leads, IT managers — typically at companies between 10 and 250 people, where there are already working systems and something real to optimise. It is built for the „where do I even start?” phase, not for a team that already has a signed specification on the table.

It tends to be worth the eight minutes if you keep hearing that „everyone does this with AI now” but nobody can tell you what that would mean in your operation; if you have three or four ideas and nothing to rank them by; if a colleague spends two days a month on something that smells automatable; or if you have already received a quote for an AI project and want a second, independent opinion on whether it makes sense at all. That last one comes up more often than you would think — and we are perfectly happy to say when someone else's quote looks fair.

It is not for you if you already have a finished, detailed specification and simply want a price — in that case write to us directly, we will get to a proposal much faster. And it is not for a one-person business looking for a tool recommendation: the report would be a cannon aimed at a sparrow.

We know the pattern: a „free audit” that turns out to be a 45-minute sales call plus a generic deck. This is not that. Preparing one assessment is roughly half a day of real work for us, and we hand it over for three reasons.

First, because we cannot make a good proposal without understanding how you actually work. Skip this step and we either overprice the project to cover our own uncertainty, or underestimate it and both sides pay for it later. Doing the homework up front is cheaper for everyone. Second, because in the current noise most decision-makers get answers to the wrong questions — a clear, honest picture of what is and is not worth automating is genuinely scarce, and it is good business for us to be the ones who provide it. Third, because a meaningful share of our projects starts with someone writing back six months after they received their report, once the timing finally works.

In practice this means the report contains implementation-ready recommendations — including the ones you can do without us. Where a no-code tool solves the problem for a monthly subscription, we write that down instead of proposing custom development.

No drip campaign, no sales sequence, no „just circling back” every fortnight. Three steps, and you decide where it stops.